Which two statements are correct about label configuration?

The statement regarding labels created at the organization level being usable in WLAN templates is correct because it highlights the hierarchical structure of Mist's configuration management. This design allows for greater flexibility and reuse of labels across different configurations and templates, ensuring that once a label is defined at the organization level, it can be consistently applied to various WLAN configurations throughout that organization.

This capability simplifies management and allows administrators to maintain a consistent naming and categorization system across multiple sites, ultimately enhancing organization-wide visibility and control over configurations. By using labels in this way, organizations can streamline their operations, as they can easily apply predefined settings to multiple WLANs without needing to recreate label definitions.

The other statements do not align with the operational capabilities of the Mist AI platform regarding label management. For instance, the idea that labels can only be created at the site level is limited in scope, overlooking the flexibility of label creation at both organization and site levels. The notion that labels must be deleted before creating new ones is also inaccurate because the platform allows for concurrent management of multiple labels, fostering better adaptability. Finally, while labels are useful for organization and identification, they are not mandatory for all configurations, meaning some configurations can be successfully deployed without the use of labels.