Which statements are correct when managing switches located in a Mist-managed site?

The correct statement regarding the management of switches in a Mist-managed site is that the switch must be assigned to the site. This is crucial because in order for a switch to be effectively managed within the Mist AI framework, it needs to be part of the designated site. The management capabilities provided by the Mist platform, such as monitoring, configuration, and updates, rely on the switch being associated with the specific site.

In contrast, while switches are designed to be part of this centralized management approach, they do not automatically become managed devices until they are explicitly assigned to a Mist-managed site. This assignment facilitates specific configurations and policies that the site administers. Essentially, if a switch is not tied to a site, it would not receive the benefits of Mist's AI-driven management capabilities.

Furthermore, the requirement of having at least one admin user in the site supports the assertion that proper management and oversight of these switches are essential, but it is not directly related to the functioning of the switches themselves. The ability for switches to operate independently of the Mist site reflects a more standalone approach and is not aligned with the intent of centralized management that the Mist platform provides.