Which Marvis Action category should be used to identify coverage issues in a network?

The Marvis Action category that is most suitable for identifying coverage issues in a network is related to Access Points (AP). This is because coverage issues are typically tied to the performance and deployment of access points throughout the environment. When analyzing coverage, it is essential to evaluate how well each access point is providing service to users and devices in their designated areas. The AP category allows network administrators to diagnose issues related to signal strength, coverage holes, and interference that may be affecting the overall wireless experience.

Identifying and troubleshooting coverage issues through this category involves reviewing metrics associated with access points, such as client connection rates, signal quality, and the distribution of clients among the APs. By focusing on access points, administrators can make informed decisions about where to enhance coverage, reposition APs, or add additional units to fill in the gaps in service.

The other categories, while also important for various aspects of network management, do not directly target the specific issue of coverage in the same way that focusing on access points does. For example, the Location category may help with understanding where users are located, but it does not provide insights on the effectiveness of the AP deployment itself. Similarly, Configuration and Performance categories tend to address issues related to settings and overall network health rather than